Room: REC A5.06
Stanislaw Piasecki is a postdoctoral researcher in information law at IViR, University of Amsterdam. His research currently focuses on the topic of the use of AI in media and journalism.
In 2022, Stanislaw completed a PhD in data protection law at the University of Nottingham (Horizon Centre for Doctoral Training). His thesis was entitled ‘Complying with the GDPR when vulnerable people use smart devices’.
During his studies, Stanislaw worked as visiting researcher at Chuo University in Tokyo by comparing the approach to AI regulation in Japan and the European Union. He has also contributed to the Defence Against Dark Artefacts (DADA) UK project on the legal and technical security aspects of the Internet of Things.
Previously, Stanislaw worked for over four years as a Political Analyst at the Embassy of Luxembourg. He completed MA studies in international law (Université Paris 1), EU law (Université Paris-Sud 11) and did a LL.M. at the University of Manchester.
| Piasecki, S.
In: Information & Communications Technology Law, 2023.
(| | )
This article introduces information gathered through 21 semi-structured interviews conducted with UK, EU and international professionals in the field of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance and technology design, with a focus on the smart home context and vulnerable people using smart products. Those discussions gave various insights and perspectives into how the two communities (lawyers and technologists) view intricate practical data protection challenges in this specific setting. The variety of interviewees allowed to compare different approaches to data protection compliance topics. Answers to the following questions were provided: when organisations develop and/or deploy smart devices that use personal data, do they take into consideration the needs of vulnerable groups of people to comply with the GDPR? What are the underlying issues linked to the practical data protection law challenges faced by organisations working on smart devices used by vulnerable persons? How do experts perceive data protection law-related problems in this context?