European law
Margoni, T.; Quintais, J.; Schwemer, S.
Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I},
author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/08/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-i/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-08},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
van Eechoud, M.
Please share nicely — From Database directive to Data (governance) acts Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2021.
@article{vanEechoud2021bb,
title = {Please share nicely \textemdash From Database directive to Data (governance) acts},
author = {van Eechoud, M.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/08/18/please-share-nicely-from-database-directive-to-data-governance-acts/},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-08-24},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Coche, E.
Heks'nkaas or the "Fifty Shades of Taste" Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law Journal Article
In: European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 2019, no. 3, pp. 173-180, 2019.
@article{Coche2019b,
title = {Heks'nkaas or the "Fifty Shades of Taste" Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law},
author = {Coche, E.},
url = {http://uba-sfx.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/uva-linker?url_ver=Z39.88-2004\&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx\&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8\&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004\&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist\&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1\&rft.object_id=110978977740233\&disable_directlink=true\&sfx.directlink=off;},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-03-12},
journal = {European Intellectual Property Review},
volume = {2019},
number = {3},
pages = {173-180},
abstract = {If the CJEU were to grant a prize to the 2018 most "original" copyright dispute, Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods (C-310/17) (the Heks’nkaas case) would undoubtedly stand among the nominees. The main reason why this case hit the spotlight is most probably because it touched upon the fundamentals of EU copyright law, namely its protectable subject-matter. Intriguingly, the complexities of copyright were unveiled by the following question: "Does Union law preclude the taste of food\textemdashas the author’s own intellectual creation\textemdashfrom being protected by copyright?" Notwithstanding the court’s dissenting answer, which clarified the scope of EU copyright law, it is of paramount importance to also discuss and unravel the ruling’s preceding procedure, including the Opinion by the Advocate General, as it shed light on the many existing controversies within copyright law.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
If the CJEU were to grant a prize to the 2018 most "original" copyright dispute, Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods (C-310/17) (the Heks’nkaas case) would undoubtedly stand among the nominees. The main reason why this case hit the spotlight is most probably because it touched upon the fundamentals of EU copyright law, namely its protectable subject-matter. Intriguingly, the complexities of copyright were unveiled by the following question: "Does Union law preclude the taste of food—as the author’s own intellectual creation—from being protected by copyright?" Notwithstanding the court’s dissenting answer, which clarified the scope of EU copyright law, it is of paramount importance to also discuss and unravel the ruling’s preceding procedure, including the Opinion by the Advocate General, as it shed light on the many existing controversies within copyright law.
C.J. Angelopoulos
Sketching the outline of a ghost: the fair balance between copyright and fundamental rights in intermediary third party liability Journal Article
In: Info, no. 6, pp. 72-96., 2015.
@article{,
title = {Sketching the outline of a ghost: the fair balance between copyright and fundamental rights in intermediary third party liability},
author = {C.J. Angelopoulos},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/info-05-2015-0028},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
journal = {Info},
number = {6},
pages = {72-96.},
note = {
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0028
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Van Rompuy, B.; Margoni, T.
UK Horserace Betting Right: at odds with EU law? Miscellaneous
2015, (
Opinion.
).
@misc{,
title = {UK Horserace Betting Right: at odds with EU law?},
author = {Van Rompuy, B. and Margoni, T.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1615.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
journal = {European Intellectual Property Review},
number = {8},
pages = {479-483.},
abstract = {
About ten years after a previous initiative to replace the Horserace Betting Levy was abandoned following a judgment from the Court of Justice (CJ),1 the UK government announced that it will introduce a Horserace Betting Right and repeal the Levy that to date has cross-subsidised horseracing. In this comment, the authors warn that the implementation of a Betting Right could be problematic from an EU law perspective. The UK government, and any other interested EU legislator, should reconsider the opportunity of a specifically devised betting right.
},
note = {
Opinion.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
About ten years after a previous initiative to replace the Horserace Betting Levy was abandoned following a judgment from the Court of Justice (CJ),1 the UK government announced that it will introduce a Horserace Betting Right and repeal the Levy that to date has cross-subsidised horseracing. In this comment, the authors warn that the implementation of a Betting Right could be problematic from an EU law perspective. The UK government, and any other interested EU legislator, should reconsider the opportunity of a specifically devised betting right.
(Ed.)
Met Europese verdrag voor Mensenrechten is niets mis Periodical
2011.
@periodical{,
title = {Met Europese verdrag voor Mensenrechten is niets mis},
author = {R. Lawson and J. Peters and E.J. Dommering and A.W. Hins},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Volkskrant_11april2011.pdf},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-04-19},
journal = {De Volkskrant},
note = {De vier auteurs stellen dat critici van het EVRM niet alleen juridisch dwalen, maar ook de feiten verdraaien. De uitgangspunten van dit verdrag gelden vandaag nog precies zo als tijdens de invoering daarvan. Dit verdrag is nog steeds niet overbodig.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {periodical}
}